The Urbane Ecologist


Leave a comment

Help decolonise Wikipedia!

The #whitecurriculum campaign is one dedicated to challenging the predominantly Eurocentric/Western/white bias of university curriculums in the West. It is planning a series of Wikipedia editing events–participants will be given the opportunity to make improvements to existing Wikipedia articles.

If you have ideas on what articles you would like to change or would like to suggest that there be an article on a topic that does not exist (but should), check this page out!

Watch this short video from Cecile Emeke on the differences between French, American, and British postcolonialism

1 Comment

Yesterday evening I went to the Decolonising the Mind Society’s (website | Facebook page) event promoting the work of young film-maker Cecile Emeke. We watched two episodes of the web series Ackee & Saltfish and the Flâner, episode 2 of the #strolling series.

This young woman’s simple eloquence on the topics of what constitutes truth and her observations of race in France in comparison to Great Britain and the United States was striking.

She noted that the French government has, by law, institutionalised the narrative that colonialism has done no wrong, and that, by eliminating the concept of race, the French government had also eliminated the ability to have a conversation about racism. She was also frustrated by how much more she knew about the conditions of American plantations, but so little was known about the conditions present in French colonies from the perspective of the colonised.

Please watch it and enjoy!


Leave a comment

UCL Fossil Fuel Divestment debate

theurbaneecologist:

Didn’t make it to the UCL fossil fuel divestment debate, but Muki Haklay did, and wrote up this great summary! Check it out.

Originally posted on Po Ve Sham - Muki Haklay's personal blog:

UCL organised a debate about fossil fuel divestment, with 7 knowledgeable speakers (all professors), raising argument for and against the suggestion that UCL should divest from fossil fuels and sell its £21million invested in the industry. In the room and on the panel there were more people who supported the motion than those who opposed it. Interestingly, at the end of the discussion more people switched to support divestment. I took notes of the positions and what people mentioned as a way to map the different views that were expressed. So here are my notes, the tl;dr point of each argument and something about my view at the end of this longish post.

Anthony Costello opened the debate and discuss that research from UCL provided evidence to justify the Guardian ‘keep it in the ground‘ campaign. The aim of the debate is to explore different views and…

View original 1,576 more words


1 Comment

The BP Horizon oil spill did a good thing — it got a bunch of people to take pictures

When the Deepwater Horizon oil spill happened (2010), I was a sophomore/second-year in college. I had recently switched from doing a degree in biochemistry to one in ecology, although I always made sure to tell people that I wouldn’t be “one of those crazy environmentalists”. The implications of what was going on didn’t really hit me at the time. Something about the scale of the accident seemed very wrong, and I knew people were being very angry about it, but I didn’t even fully get the humor of South Park’s “We’re Sorry” spoof of BP CEO’s attempt at showing concern.

Some of the implications of the oil spill trickled down to the conservative, determinedly apolitical, and most certainly completely uninterested in the environment student body to me in occasional conversation. One of my friends, who had happened to begin an internship with BP right before the spill, told me how he always made sure to hide his ID card before he left the office so people wouldn’t see who he worked for.

The following year, I went to Galveston beach, on the shores of the Gulf  of Mexico, for the first time as part of a fieldwork practice module, where we were taught how ecologists sweep nets over the sea floor to collect organisms,which would then be counted to estimate things like species abundance. I squealed when the shrimp jumped, and generally felt more comfortable with the notebook and the pen on the beach than I did walking over the rocky beach bed, being thrown off balance by the current.

The following year–my final one as an undergraduate– I took a conservation class, which finally got me thinking about how ecological principles related with people. It was a very careful course–not too much about climate change, and conservation was always something that happened only when people were not around–but what I did get out of it were (1) that environmental problems exist on a massive scale and that something needs to be done, and; (2) a thing called urban ecology exists. I was on my way to becoming a “crazy environmentalist”. Over the course of that year, many of my friends and classmates got jobs relating to the oil industry in Houston–BP, Exxon, whatever–and some went to UT Austin to study oil and gas law. I never brought up these issues with one of my very good friends at the time, who had gotten a job involving being on the rigs in the Gulf and deep sea drilling. She was–and remains–one of the nicest people I know, and I wasn’t sure whether breaking the bubble of willful ignorance would do more harm than good. She loved her work and did it well, but she was determinedly apolitical–what was the point of me pushing my crazy ideas when it would likely result in a desire to stop visiting me, rather than a eureka moment that culminated in a dramatic resignation from BP?

Nowadays, I occasionally read in the news how BP keeps attempting to refuse responsibility for the accident, or about how dolphins and turtles are dying in record numbers in the Gulf. But I learned yesterday that something I have become interested in–participatory mapping–had a big part to play in how people living in the Gulf reacted to the spill, even though I had no idea it was going on at the time.

To backtrack, participatory mapping derives, academically, from scholars of “critical cartography”, who challenge the political and ideological assumptions of how maps are made. While maps seems unambiguous and factual and in no way skewed one way or another, that is far from true! There is great power in making a map–in deciding what categories you put in of whatever you are showing, in choosing your scale, in choosing whether something even appears on a map, you essentially decide what matters or not. One only has to think of the consequences of the great imperial powers casually dividing up the continent of Africa to realize the immense consequences of what using maps can do. Participatory mapping challenges that. It brings the power of making maps to “ordinary” people, giving them the power to challenge the stories that may be told about them and where they live and to advocate for what they may need.

A decade or so ago the technology related to mapping, such as the cameras and satellites that took the images and the software that put them together, were out of the price range of most people. They cost a lot of money and the only way to really have access to them was through your university or company. Furthermore, the software was not easy to learn right away, which meant that when you left the place where you first learned it, you had no way of practicing it. But nowadays a lot of open source software exists (e.g. Quantum GIS), which means that it’s free and you can figure things out on your own, and the process of taking the pictures doesn’t require anything prohibitively expensive or difficult to find. The idea is, you attach a camera to balloon or a kite and have it take pictures, and then you overlay the pictures on maps that already exist in Google Earth, and then you can see how things change. In this way, you can get a granularity that you would not otherwise get from occasional satellite images (which is what you get whenever you go on Google Maps or Google Earth). Groups participating in and advocating participatory mapping have been growing and, as it turns out, the Galveston Oil Spill was the catalyst to getting one active group together.

Yesterday, at a talk given by Cindy Regalado from the Extreme Citizen Science research group at UCL, I learned that, while most Rice University students were living fairly obliviously to what was going on around them, people living in and around the Gulf area had joined forces and decided to map the effects the oil spill was having on the coast, in association with Public Lab, making 80 maps out of 100,000 images. They worked in groups called the Louisiana Bucket Brigade and Grassroots Mapping and funded themselves through a Kickstarter campaign. The software that puts together the pictures onto existing maps–MapKnitter–was developed directly as a consequence of that oil spill. Cindy took us through an exercise where we overlaid some photos on a site. It’s really easy! Assuming you have taken aerial photos, simply upload them to MapKnitter and go for it! In terms of making the balloons or kites that go up in the air, the materials are as simple as rubber bands, basic point and shoot cameras, pieces of paper, and construction tarp.

Meanwhile, the project called ReMap Lima, which is being conducted by my course instructors, Rita Lambert and Adriana Allen, uses drones in association with a Swiss NGO called Drone Adventures. Rita pointed out that one advantage drones have over other forms of mapping is that they can construct high-quality 3D images. This is extremely helpful in understanding Lima’s marginalized communities because they live on hillsides and, indeed, the only way to understand the complexities of how they live in relation to where they live is by looking at it in 3D, and not with a flat view from above. In this context, the most useful form of participatory mapping–drones and not kites or balloons–is not immediately accessible to those who can benefit from it. We see that in this project we touch upon the issues of the “digital divide”. In other words, if a university in London had not gotten in touch with a Swiss NGO to get these drones, how would the residents of the neighborhoods they are working with have been able to engage in effective participatory mapping practices?

Another issue inherent in the choice in picking drones vs balloons or kites is community engagement. On the beach in Spain last summer, I looked up from my book to find a drone buzzing around, and I recall a vague feeling of violation. Nobody had asked me if they could take pictures of me and yes, I know they weren’t taking pictures of me per se and all I was doing was reading a book, but it would have been nice to have a choice or to ask whoever was flying it what they were doing or why. With kites or balloons, on the other hand, mapping becomes a public act; “you can trace the string back to the person holding it, and you can engage with the community by allowing people to ask you what you are doing”, as Cindy says.

The feeling of violation I got on the beach in Spain is very similar to that I feel whenever I think of all the surveillance on the part of state and private forces that happens every day; as a matter of fact, the feeling is worse. While I could clearly see and identify what was watching me on the beach, I have no idea who is watching me and where at any given time anywhere else, unless I specifically look for a CCTV camera. And for that reason, I was strongly opposed to drones. But knowing that sometimes drones can be more helpful that kites or balloons does not make them all-evil; furthermore, drones are and will be used anyway, so it may be more helpful to use them as a way of challenging the forces that use them rather than not engaging with them at all.

So here we go–I never thought I’d say this, but I finally found one good thing to come out of the BP oil disaster. Hopefully, in the decades ahead, we’ll see participatory mapping becoming a means of preventing environmental disasters rather than documenting them.


Leave a comment

Check out the new YouTube channel “On the Map, Off the Radar”

I just happened to come across “On the Map, Off the Radar“, a new YouTube channel run by Oxford students who delve into issues rarely explored in mainstream media.

So far, they have three videos: “Elections in Nigeria with Sa’eed Husaini”, “A brief history of the conflict of South Sudan“, and “Quinoa – how global consumption patterns affect locals“. I loved them all! They’re short and engaging and very informative. Looking forward to seeing more!

 


Leave a comment

Notes from LSE’s Unlocking the Potential: Infrastructure Financing in Africa

Here is the event description:

IMAG3331_1

The scene was set by Teddy Brett from the LSE Department of International Development, who hit the following points:

  • “Africa’s growth story” shows “great potential for future development”
  • Continent characterized by rural areas and is highly depended on agriculture
  • Countries on the continent have a high food import bill
  • With proper investment, could double agricultural investment in five years
  • China, Brazil, South Korea, and India are major actors on the scene of foreign investment in Africa, “but the problem is that China operates in an entirely different way”

My audio recordings of the event can be found here. They begin with the first speaker (not Teddy Brett but Rob Donnelly from Shell) who is unfortunately very difficult to understand in these recordings. The second speaker (Andrew Maclean, DFID) begins somewhere after about the tenth minute and is relatively more audible. Recordings go up to the end of the question time, although there is a gap between the first and the second recording where my phone automatically timed out.


Leave a comment

Happy Divestment Day! (Update)

As divestment campaigns are kicking off around the world, let’s spend a few minutes celebrating them on Global Divestment Day!

I haven’t been as involved in UCL Fossil Free’s divestment campaign as I want to (because learning about the environment has been so intense I haven’t been able to spend as much time actually protecting it as I would like…) but they have been doing an amazing job! They recently had a “Love-In” where they covered themselves in oil and staged an orgy involving Shell, BP, and the UCL Provost, Michael Arthur. Here’s a summary article, and here is an interview. Naomi Klein talks about the relationship between divestment campaigns and the carbon bubble in this interview with 350.org here.

Worldwide, events are going on to promote divestment from fossil fuels–check them out and try to get involved! Get inspired by checking out how Fossil Free UK–in the form of carbon bubbles–got in Shell CEO Ben Van Beurden’s way as he tried to make a speech at the International Petroleum Conference. Read about how the Metropolitan police, the Greater London Authority, and the Westminster city council are getting in the way of climate change protesters’ freedom to protest.

border

Update on events (16 February 2015): 

The Go Fossil Free website has compiled some great stats, media reports, and multimedia things showing the massive global support for divestment.

Fossil Free UCL’s activities alone were highlighted in a variety of publications, including this mention in the Guardian feature “Global Divestment Day: ‘We are ready for urgent action on climate change’:

Guinevere Carter, UCL Fossil Free Activist

 

Londoners, if you are in town on March 29, try to participate in BP or Not BP Flashmob at the British Museum, which is sponsored by BP. (The company also sponsors many other art and culture institutions in and around London.)

In browsing the interwebs, I found this PhD studentship on the “Sustainability of Manufactured Water” at UCL, funded by BHP Billiton! How lovely. (If you are confused as to why that’s strange/wrong, I wrote a piece on it here.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.